We performed a comparison between MHR iTrent and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration."MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"The tool's best feature is SAP SuccessFactors."
"The payroll and time management features are useful."
"The tool's most valuable features for our HR operations include easy reporting capabilities, which allow us to generate reports for management meetings and auditing purposes. Additionally, it supports appointment preparation and processing benefits."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"Technical support is excellent."
"Customers can create custom infotypes to store any custom data points."
"The setup was straightforward."
"Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all."
"SAP is not ready to sell the license on time and delays the progress of projects. It's better to work with a competitor like Oracle. Those that are selling the product just go through powerpoints and don't have the knowledge necessary to sell. They can't answer any questions."
"It would be very helpful for our company if a new version was released with the ability to contain all of the things that we have newly introduced in our company."
"We find some challenges in the integration between SAP HCM and SAP SuccessFactors."
"I would like it to move more towards a single data space, a single data source. SAP as a platform relies on multiple data sources because traditionally, it's been bolted together by the acquisition of other products rather than a single database. That's why there are lots of points of failure and lots of required points of integration. They need a single integration point."
"A better user interface and greater AI integration are crucial."
"System usability is a challenge."
"I'm currently working for a state-owned government company, and we need to follow some standards and regulations. We also have a strategy to be followed. Sometimes the template and the format are not available in the SAP HCM, so we have to work around this limitation. The tax also sometimes changes in my country, and we have to redo everything to change the payroll calculations, benefits, and things like that. The talent management feature can be improved. It is currently very simple in SAP HCM. SAP is also very hard to integrate. In terms of monitoring, there are no monitoring tools, but as long as we take care of the disk capacity, there is no problem."
"The product's learning and development features could be better, including new exclusive LMS tools."
MHR iTrent is ranked 17th in Benefits Administration with 1 review while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Benefits Administration with 45 reviews. MHR iTrent is rated 6.0, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of MHR iTrent writes "A scalable solution with good functionalities, but customer support needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". MHR iTrent is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Access PeopleXD and SAP SuccessFactors, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleStrong .
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.