Compare Micro Focus ALM Octane vs. Orcanos ALM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Saves time by making the most important information and functions available with one or two clicks
The most important thing is that we have, 8,000 users, more or less, and if you could save each user who's working with our current ALM tool, just... Read more »
Use Orcanos ALM? Share your opinion.
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2021.
Download now
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time.""In terms of pricing, it's comparable to what we had previously. It's not priced at the higher end of the scale by any means. It's priced nicely, in the middle of the market. For what you're getting, it's a very good tool.""Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses.""The solution has reduced our testing costs.""Microsoft is a big challenge for Micro Focus when it comes to pricing because they are much cheaper. But it definitely depends on the complexity of the environment. If it has multiple technologies, at that point, looking at other options and Microsoft would be a feasible approach.""The comparison is always with Jira, so the pricing of Octane is a bit on the higher side. But if you look at what you have to add to Jira, on the plug-in side, to have the same abilities you have with Octane, you're more or less even, or even ahead with Octane."

More Micro Focus ALM Octane Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What is the biggest difference between Micro Focus ALM Octane and Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Top Answer: Azure DevOps is well suited if you have a big team that is collaborating their codes and need to have devops pipeline for all build and release work. Also since this tool provides bug management… more »
Read all 2 answers
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
5th
out of 33 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Views
16,258
Comparisons
9,778
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
1,397
Rating
8.4
32nd
out of 33 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Views
25
Comparisons
20
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Jira vs. Micro Focus ALM Octane
Compared 48% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
Micro Focus Octane
Learn
Micro Focus
Orcanos
Overview

In support of the bimodal nature of many customers today, Micro Focus has expanded the ALM experience by introducing ALM Octane, as a separate platform that is tuned and designed for high-velocity, Lean and Agile teams. ALM Octane is an included part of the ALM product, and integrates with both Micro Focus Agile Manager and the traditional Micro Focus ALM.NET platform to allow teams to easily share assets and report across projects.

We Specialize in helping Medical Device Manufacturers in their regulatory compliance, using Orcanos cloud software.

We have been particularly successful with manufacturers that were concern about the cost of manual traceability management and were unhappy with the bottlenecks created using a paper-based quality system, that slowed down the organization and put it at high risk.

Our vision is to create a complete and integrated design control and quality management solution that saves time to our customers, saves attention and resource, and especially reduce the overall risk of the company.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Octane
Learn More
Learn more about Orcanos ALM
Learn More
Sample Customers
Orange Labs, Airbus, Haufe GroupAirspan Networks, Zimmer MedizinSysteme, Medset, Mazor Robotics, Fio, AVO-ADAM, Synergetik, LifeWatch, Kornit Digital, Argo Medical, QSite
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company31%
Comms Service Provider31%
Financial Services Firm19%
Consumer Goods Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise91%
No Data Available
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2021.
Download now
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus ALM Octane is ranked 5th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while Orcanos ALM is ranked 32nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Micro Focus ALM Octane is rated 8.6, while Orcanos ALM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Octane writes "Saves time by making the most important information and functions available with one or two clicks". On the other hand, Micro Focus ALM Octane is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Microsoft Azure DevOps, ServiceNow IT Business Management and Rally Software, whereas Orcanos ALM is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.