Compare Micro Focus ALM Octane vs. PractiTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus ALM Octane Logo
16,496 views|9,737 comparisons
PractiTest Logo
1,219 views|857 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PractiTest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It will be as expensive as ALM.NET, if not more expensive. But here's a good tip: If you have ALM.NET, you are able to share your licenses from ALM.NET to Octane. You just have to define a dedicated number of licenses on ALM.NET and then you can share them with ALM Octane, with some configuration effort. This is something that you have to take into account, that there is a possibility of such license sharing that could decrease your costs. Compared to open-source tools, the price the ALM Octane is definitely higher, in terms of the licensing cost.""It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time.""It's expensive. HPE products, and now Micro Focus, have always been expensive. The license is not cheap, and it will always be a challenge, particularly for small organizations like ours.""For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time.""In terms of pricing, it's comparable to what we had previously. It's not priced at the higher end of the scale by any means. It's priced nicely, in the middle of the market. For what you're getting, it's a very good tool."

More Micro Focus ALM Octane Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Azure DevOps is well suited if you have a big team that is collaborating their codes and need to have devops pipeline for all build and release work. Also since this tool provides bug management… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
16,496
Comparisons
9,737
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
1,946
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
1,219
Comparisons
857
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Octane
Learn
Micro Focus
PractiTest
Overview

In support of the bimodal nature of many customers today, Micro Focus has expanded the ALM experience by introducing ALM Octane, as a separate platform that is tuned and designed for high-velocity, Lean and Agile teams. ALM Octane is an included part of the ALM product, and integrates with both Micro Focus Agile Manager and the traditional Micro Focus ALM.NET platform to allow teams to easily share assets and report across projects.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Octane
Learn more about PractiTest
Sample Customers
Orange Labs, Airbus, Haufe GroupCanonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company36%
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider9%
Consumer Goods Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Large Enterprise100%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business1%
Large Enterprise99%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus ALM Octane is ranked 4th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 11 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Micro Focus ALM Octane is rated 8.0, while PractiTest is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Octane writes "Saves time by making the most important information and functions available with one or two clicks". On the other hand, Micro Focus ALM Octane is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Rally Software and ServiceNow IT Business Management, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.