Micro Focus ALM vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Micro Focus ALM is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 50 reviews vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform which is ranked 10th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM writes "Provides QA management and project management - testing, defect management, and reporting". The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Customizable dashboards show project health. Every team member gets notified about their performance and no one gets lost in what to do". Micro Focus ALM is most compared with JIRA, TFS and CA Agile Central. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with JIRA, TFS and Micro Focus ALM. See our Micro Focus ALM vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus ALM vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
291,977 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Micro Focus ALM vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed.This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too.It provides visibility on release status and readiness.It allows us to easily make linkage and dependencies, with plenty of integrations.Lab Management is a valuable feature, because you have a 360 view.As a system administrator, HPE ALM can be flexibly configured so that it can accommodate a variety of defined project lifecycles and test methodologies.Quality management, project management from a QA perspective - testing, defect management, how testing relates back to requirements.It's basically the way to show the work that we do as QA testers, and to have a historical view of those executions.

Read more »

It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams.

Read more »

Cons
There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic.It needs Pure-FTPd WebUI and single sign-on.The QA needs improvement.HPE ALM’s out-of-the-box reporting can be perceived as rigid and limited, to an extent.I'd like to see the concept of teams put into it.I'd like to be able to improve how our QA department uses the tool, by getting better educational resources, documentation to help with competencies for my testers.It's not intuitive in that way, which has always been a problem, especially with business users.Client-side ActiveX with patch upgrades

Read more »

Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product.If you have more than five users, a concurrent licensing model should be considered.

Read more »

Costly.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
291,977 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
38,560
Comparisons
14,158
Reviews
50
Followers
1,925
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
1,758
Comparisons
568
Reviews
2
Followers
223
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
See more Micro Focus ALM competitors »
See more Parasoft Development Testing Platform competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsHPE ALMParasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
Parasoft
Overview
Overview

Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management software (ALM), is a unified platform that helps teams prioritize, align and focus their project activities, provides actionable insight, and fosters the re-use of assets from requirements through development, testing, and readiness for delivery. 

Built on best practices, an extensible architecture and centralized repository, Micro Focus ALM is one of the first unified, technology-agnostic application management systems available now; integrating out-of-the-box with over 30 open source and competitive industry products.

Micro Focus’s ALM suite provides flexible solutions and deployment options to meet your needs and scale with you as you grow.

Parasoft Concerto is a Software Development Management infrastructure that increases productivity and reduces costs. Parasoft Concerto complements an organization's existing technical infrastructure, connecting distributed components in order to better facilitate natural human workflow. Parasoft Concerto manages "what" needs to be accomplished within the context of "how" management expects those tasks to be accomplished.
OFFER
Learn more about Micro Focus ALM
Learn more about Parasoft Development Testing Platform
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersSpecsavers, Cardinal Health, KMD, TurkcellComcast, Lufthansa, Samsung,CAE, Canon, FedEx
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Pharma/Biotech Company
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
35%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Insurance Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
77%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
6%
Midsize Enterprise
10%
Large Enterprise
84%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus ALM vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
Download now
291,977 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email