We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Snare based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The machine learning is a good feature."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"The technical support team is good...It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."
"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."
"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."
"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."
"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 29th in Log Management with 30 reviews while Snare is ranked 41st in Log Management with 3 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Snare is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snare writes "A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Snare is most compared with syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, LogRhythm SIEM and ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). See our ArcSight Logger vs. Snare report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.