We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and OpenText Operations Bridge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."It is stable and scalable."
"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."
"It's a very good product overall."
"It has greatly reduced the number and duration of outages as support teams are notified immediately when something goes wrong or even before something breaks."
"Flexible dashboard with the availability of widgets."
"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"You can create an application topology that shows relationships between different components."
"The broad integration possibilities, I'd say, with any kind of product, are probably the most valuable feature."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."
"The setup process can get a little bit complex."
"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."
"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"Our issues are largely support related due to where we are and the knowledge base that we have here. This issue relates both HPE in general and to the technical products."
"The pricing could be improved."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, BMC Helix Monitor, Splunk Enterprise Security and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.