Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] vs Quest On Demand Licence Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and Quest On Demand Licence Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management.
To learn more, read our detailed License Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Quest On Demand Licence Management?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From my experience, Asset Manager is expensive."
  • More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In License Management
    23rd
    out of 24 in License Management
    Views
    41
    Comparisons
    15
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    License Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Asset Manager, HPE Asset Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    HPE Asset Manager automates best practices across the asset management lifecycle and integrates processes into IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) service support workflows including incident, problem, and change management to improve service quality and business outcomes.

    IT administrators are responsible for managing users' Office 365 licenses including assigning and configuring Office 365 and Azure AD licenses for new employees, cancelling or transferring existing licenses when employees leave the company, and reassigning unassigned licenses to other users. Office 365 license management is a crucial role that ensures the optimum number of licenses are available to support your business today and into the future. Equally important, it ensures that you aren't spending valuable IT budget on more licenses than you really need. Quest® On Demand License Management provides visibility into Microsoft Office 365 licenses and the reporting capabilities needed to help IT administrators achieve optimal license utilization.

    Sample Customers
    Finansbank, MTS India, Sprint
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    License Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in License Management while Quest On Demand Licence Management is ranked 23rd in License Management. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while Quest On Demand Licence Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Quest On Demand Licence Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best License Management vendors.

    We monitor all License Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.