We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and vCenter Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."It is stable and scalable."
"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"My experience working with this solution has been good and I recommend it."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"The platform is straightforward and user friendly."
"We can scale the solution as needed."
"There are a lot of useful features, such as DRS, ease of use, and many configuration options."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to see which virtual machines need more resources or are over-committed."
"I like vMotion because it manages fault tolerance."
"I particularly appreciate the reporting capabilities, as they allow for in-depth analysis of logs and the ability to interpret alerts effectively, enabling informed responses."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"Acquiring certifications often require extensive training and successfully passing an exam, which can be costly and time-consuming, particularly if you already possess experience in the domain. As a result, this can increase the overall cost of obtaining certification and may present a challenge that requires addressing."
"It can take a long time for the first information to become available. On the other hand, that's normal. It has to collect a lot of information before it can predict future needs. But it would be nice if there was some kind of base level to get started."
"The product's high price is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"It would be better to integrate this infrastructure with native cloud environments, but we can't do it. We are trying to improve our experience by converting our infrastructure through virtualization on native cloud environments and workloads."
"There isn't a clear document covering all the errors. It would be helpful if the company provided better documentation for solving issues."
"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which could be cheaper."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The solution's pricing is very high and could be improved."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
More vCenter Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while vCenter Configuration Manager is ranked 10th in Configuration Management with 50 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while vCenter Configuration Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Configuration Manager writes "A solution with a range of functionalities and several pricing plans that suit your needs". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas vCenter Configuration Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Satellite and BigFix.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.