We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management."We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is its configuration."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"The solution’s interface could be improved."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in License Management while Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is ranked 9th in License Management with 1 review. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager writes "A highly stable solution that provides good authentication security and monitoring". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is most compared with .
See our list of best License Management vendors.
We monitor all License Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
