OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Process Monitoring and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability has been very good over the years.""Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Pros →

"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful.""The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out.""The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."

More OpenText Diagnostics Pros →

Cons
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less.""The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Cons →

"The interface could be more user friendly.""The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI.""The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."

More OpenText Diagnostics Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
479
Comparisons
393
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
579
Comparisons
389
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Sample Customers
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company17%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog, whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Accedian Skylight.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.