OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed.""The stability has been very good over the years."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Pros →

"Having standard monitoring features and a central repository saves us a lot of time and reduces risk of incidents.""Dell Foglight does analyze and optimize your virtual infrastructure. It definitely reduces operational cost.""It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers.""Sometimes we can solve problems before they occur.""Capacity on database and file servers. I found the algorithms to forecast growth and concerns particularly intuitive.""With the APM you can replay the end user session and see issues quickly by viewing the session.""At a glance I can easily see what is going on with all of my VMware ​environments, including top consumers of resources.""FxV is valuable as we can playback the session."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less.""The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Cons →

"SQL agents often failed but again this may have been addressed in future versions.""It needs a more intuitive way to create and implement custom "Cartridges" to be deployed through out a Federated environment.""I want to see mobile access application in the next release.""We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort.""There are some metrics I'd like to track that are difficult to find or implement into a tracking solution without a lot of manual work.""They need to improve the stability of FxM and FxV.""Being able to incorporate other bespoke monitoring into Foglight would have made the tool even more useful.""I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."
  • "The price is expensive for us."
  • "Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."
  • "Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."
  • More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
    Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    479
    Comparisons
    393
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
    Foglight, Dell Foglight
    Learn More
    Quest Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

    Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

    Review affected service level agreements.

    BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

    Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.
    Sample Customers
    United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
    Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Wholesaler/Distributor9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Educational Organization11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0, while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] writes "We evaluated other options including BMC, but chose Foglight for it's notifications & the ability to review the history". OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog, whereas Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is most compared with Catchpoint.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.