We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Processing Testing and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The documentation is limited."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with , whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
