We performed a comparison between OpenText Cloud Service Automation and Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."
"The solution is reliable."
"The tool is mainly for monitoring databases, especially focusing on performance. It supports various databases, including Oracle, allowing daily activity monitoring. The solution enables displaying performance metrics, providing continuous tracking. It also offers management capabilities for connected databases, featuring graphical performance graphs. Users can perform tasks like killing sessions and controlling database elements. Additionally, it allows viewing tables, SAN disks, and other database components."
"Advisors provide quick access to Insight and best practice information for performance tuning and configuration."
"The dashboard and reporting help us to do preventative AI and analytics to detect performance bottlenecks."
"It is easier to manage your Oracle Database backups and create email alerts regarding the status of your backups (Succeeded or Failed)."
"From a performance perspective, the management capabilities of the product are very valuable to its customers."
"Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control has an amazing GUI interface that does a lot of tasks with fewer steps rather than making it manual on the database or the operating system side."
"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."
"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."
"They need to simplify it and make it lighter."
"You cannot use Enterprise Manager as replacement for a WebLogic console."
"I've had both positive and negative experiences with support. Its compatibility with the rest of the products in the market is less."
"Because this solution provides insight into all of the areas within the IT stack, it would benefit from enhancements in security."
"The product does have room for improvement in patch management."
"The product lacks in the area of database, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The response time of the solution's technical support team is too long and should be improved."
"The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database."
More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is ranked 16th in Cloud Management with 34 reviews. OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0, while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control writes "A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen". OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is most compared with AWS Control Tower, IBM Turbonomic and VMware Aria Operations. See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
