Compare Micro Focus Content Manager vs. Objective ECM
 | Eric Wyatt IT Director / CIO at Matanuska-Sustina Borough |
Use Objective ECM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
2,259
Comparisons
1,322
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
533
Rating
3.0
Views
892
Comparisons
737
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 56% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
Micro Focus Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.
Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.
Learn more about Micro Focus Content Manager
Learn more about Objective ECM
Missouri State Courts
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Government58%
Healthcare Company8%
Non Profit8%
Non Tech Company8%
Computer Software Company35%
Government21%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company4%
Government34%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider11%
Educational Organization4%
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise36%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Content Manager is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while Objective ECM is ranked 19th in Enterprise Content Management. Micro Focus Content Manager is rated 3.0, while Objective ECM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Content Manager writes "Difficult to learn, poor technical support, and needs better integration with SharePoint". On the other hand, Micro Focus Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, IBM FileNet, OpenText Content Suite Platform, Alfresco and IBM ECM, whereas Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, OpenText Content Suite Platform and Atlassian Confluence.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.