Hyland Perceptive Content vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
176 views|133 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
349 views|158 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland Perceptive Content and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Document Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."
  • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs. You will have to pay more… more »
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    176
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    349
    Comparisons
    158
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ImageNow
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Hyland
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Perceptive Content is a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content lifecycle, from capture to disposition. Flexible functionality across multiple business applications, integration with virtually any business application and a simple-to-use interface help Perceptive Content transform internal processes and the customer experience. Perceptive Content helps users work smarter by surfacing content in context with other relevant business information. Digital documents can be viewed simultaneously, which promotes enhanced collaboration and communication among employees, customers and vendors. Locating relevant documents in the context of a business process increases customer satisfaction and employee productivity. Automated lifecycle management helps organizations comply with their records and retention policies, which reduces the risk of compliance violations and resulting fees and fines.

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Sample Customers
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    University20%
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Document Management Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 12th in Document Management Software while OpenText Content Manager is ranked 4th in Document Management Software with 21 reviews. Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 6.6, while OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Hyland Perceptive Content writes "With workflows, a group of people can be working on appeals and forward them all to one queue". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase, Box, Alfresco and SharePoint, whereas OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Microsoft Purview Records Management.

    See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.