Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient.
The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases.
The solution allows us to be able to backup and exchange directly, to backup Microsoft exchange.
This solution is quite stable because we have only three users.
Performs the backup properly and protects our data.
I have used Micro Focus Data Protector for the file backup facilities. My primary use of the software is to backup file data.
It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software.
I'm able to track everyone who is trying to send information outside the environment and to know if they are not supposed to be sending it. I'm also able to see the people who are accessing or maybe try to access the information they are not supposed to be accessing based on their level of classification. It gives me overall control of who has got access to what and at what point. And who can do what with specific information.
The features I like most about this solution is the endpoint modules because it gives us the protection we need.
They have a feature on the management side called the document indexer. Let's say you have a unique document with many near identical versions, which have one or several values that change, while the rest of the content stays the same. You can collect 50 of those documents and put them into this feature of the Symantec DLP system. It will compress them and create a profile specifically for that document.
The product is very stable.
The synchronize application detection policies have been very good.
We are able to contain our confidential data in our environment.
One of the most valuable features is that you can check attachments.
People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison.
It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions.
The solution is not intuitive enough. I think they should work on the user experience and the graphical interface. These can be a lot better.
The technical support was very slow.
The technical support is poor and should be improved.
They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use.
The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector.
In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company. However, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption. In those cases, you might need things like your DLP to be able to monitor and block some of that. The solution needs to catch information communicated through the data center on the server-side.
I do have a problem with the database.
That fine tuning has to be done for the customer as well as the vendor. So if I take Symantec DLP, we have to have some final fine tuning but we may need some time developing this depending on the customer. This is an area where something can be done to improve the product.
Virtualization is not currently supported.
We want a more proactive reporting structure.
They could improve the predefined reports because they don't have much information. We would like detailed reports.
We are finding delayed response if the macOS is updated. They need to make sure their solution is compatible.
Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment.
In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing.
In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP works with Oracle Database. Oracle Database licensing is much more expensive than other databases. That might be a drawback for customers. The pricing is on a yearly subscription basis.
We are happy with the pricing and licencing.
The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts.
The pricing and licensing are based on per user endpoints.
From what I know the pricing is good, it's not too expensive. If you negotiate you can get a good price.
out of 76 in Backup and Recovery Software
Average Words per Review
out of 22 in Data Loss Prevention
Average Words per Review
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
|Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector||Symantec DLP|
Built on a unified architecture that leverages analytics and automation, Micro Focus Data Protector delivers comprehensive data protection, real-time intelligence, and guided optimization to ensure simple, reliable, intelligent and cost-effective backup and recovery that is just as agile as your current and future IT environments. By standardizing the backup and recovery of information spread across locations, applications, formats, storage platforms, operating systems, and hypervisors, Data Protector provides assurance for mission critical information from the core to the edge, across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.
Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:
• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems
• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network
• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used
Learn more about Micro Focus Data Protector
Learn more about Symantec Data Loss Prevention
|GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company||Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company|
Financial Services Firm12%
Software R&D Company25%
Comms Service Provider15%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
Software R&D Company22%
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider17%