Most Helpful Review
Researched Micro Focus Fortify on Demand but chose Veracode: Improved our security posture without the overhead of supporting infrastructure
Researched SonarQube but chose Micro Focus Fortify on Demand: Good development platform integration promotes a culture of Security by design
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. SonarQube and other solutions. Updated: February 2020.
396,781 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.
I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.
The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.
We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.
One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important.
It has an easy-to-use interface.
Veracode provides faster scans compared to other static analysis security testing tools.
It has almost completely eliminated the presence of SQLi vulnerabilities.
Fortify on Demand is easy to use and the reporting is good.
The most valuable feature is that it connects with your development platforms, such as Microsoft Information Server and Jira.
This product is top-notch solution and the technology is the best on the market.
t's a cloud-based solution, so there was no installation involved.
The static code analyzers are the most valuable features of this solution.
The solution scans our code and provides us with a dashboard of all the vulnerabilities and the criticality of the vulnerabilities. It is very useful that they provide right then and there all the information about the vulnerability, including possible fixes, as well as some additional documentation and links to the authoritative sources of why this is an issue and what's the correct way to deal with it.
I do not remember any issues with stability.
The licensing was good.
The most valuable features are the dashboard reports and the ease of integrating it with Jenkins.
Strong code evaluation for budget-minded clients.
If code coverage is a low number then that's of great value to me.
SonarQube is good for checking and maintaining code quality.
Using SonarQube has helped us to identify areas of technical debt to work on, resulting in better code, fewer vulnerabilities, and fewer bugs.
We advise all of our developers to have this solution in place.
If you want to have your code scanned and timed then this is a good tool.
We have the software metrics that SonarQube gives us, which is something we did not have before. This helps us work towards aiming coding standards to empower us to move in the direction of better code quality. SonarQube provides targets and metrics for that.
One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.
Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.
I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.
Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.
We would like a way to mark entire modules as "safe." The lack of this feature hasn't stopped us previously, it just makes our task more tedious at times. That kind of feature would save us time.
Veracode scans provide a higher number of false positives.
The overall reporting structure is complicated, and it's difficult to understand the report.
It needs more timely support for newer languages and framework versions.
The vulnerability analysis does not always provide guidelines for what the developer should do in order to correct the problem, which means that the code has to be manually inspected and understood.
This solution would be improved if the code-quality perspective were added to it, on top of the security aspect.
The technical support is actually a problem that needs to be addressed. Since the acquisition and merger with Hewlett Packard, it has been really hard to know who the technical or salesperson to talk to.
The solution has some issues with latency. Sometimes it takes a while to respond. This issue should be addressed.
The reporting capabilities need improvement, as there are some features that we would like to have but are not available at the moment.
Primarily for a complex, advanced website, they don't really understand some of the functionalities. So for instance, they could tell us that there is a vulnerability because somebody could possibly do something, but they don't really understand the code to realize that we actually negate that vulnerability through some other mechanism in the program. In addition, the technical support is just not there. We have open tickets. They don't respond. Even if they respond, we're not seeing eye to eye. As the company got sold and bought, the support got worse.
There were some regulated compliances, which were not there.
Sometimes when we run a full scan, we have a bunch of issues in the code. We should not have any issues.
Although it has Sonar built into it, it is still lacking. Customization features of identifying a particular attack still need to be worked on. To give you an example: if we want to scan and do a false positive analysis, those types of features are missing. If we want to rescan something from a particular point that is a feature that is also missing. It’s in our queue. That will hopefully save a lot of time.
Expression of common vulnerabilities and exposures is not always current.
I don't believe you can have metrics of code quality based upon code analysis. I don't think it's possible for a computer to do it.
I would like to see more options for security, beyond the basics like SQL injection.
The solution is a bit lacking on the security side, in terms of finding and identifying vulnerabilities.
I would like to see dynamic code analysis in the next version of the software.
The reporting is good, but I am not able to download a specific report as a PDF, so downloading reports is something that should be looked at.
We've been using the Community Edition, which means that we get to use it at our leisure, and they're kind enough to literally give it to us. However, it takes a fair amount of effort to figure out how to get everything up and running. Since we didn't go with the professional paid version, we're not entitled to support. Of course that could be self-correcting if we were to make the step to buy into this and really use it. Then their technical support would be available to us to make strides for using it better.
Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.
They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.
Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.
No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.
It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.
I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.
Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.
I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.
The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition.
It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount.
The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server.
The subscription model, on a per-scan basis, is a bit expensive. That's another reason we are not using it for all the apps.
A low cost long-term solution for non-critical situations.
We are using the free, unlicensed version.
The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty decent.
We're using their free Community Edition version.
Some of the plugins that were previously free are not free now.
The price point on SonarQube is good.
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
|Fortify on Demand||Sonar|
Veracode is an application security company that offers an automated cloud-based service for securing web, mobile and third-party enterprise applications. Veracode provides multiple security analysis technologies on a single platform, including static analysis, dynamic analysis, mobile application behavioral analysis and software composition analysis.
Micro Focus Fortify on Demand’s application security-as-a-service is the easy and flexible way to identify vulnerabilities in your applications without additional investment in software or personnel. Allow our global team to work for you, providing support and technical expertise 24/7.
|SonarQube is the central place to manage code quality, offering visual reporting on and across projects and enabling to replay the past to follow metrics evolution|
Keep your software secure
Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.
Learn more about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
Learn more about SonarQube
|State of Missouri, Rekner||SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.||Bank of America, Siemens, Cognizant, Thales, Cisco, eBay|
Financial Services Firm31%
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Financial Services Firm42%
Software R&D Company8%
Software R&D Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm7%
Financial Services Firm36%
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm7%