Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Neotys NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros »

"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.""NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.""I like the scripting and parameterization features.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"Improvements to the reporting would be good.""I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons »

"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.""While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

More Neotys NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.
Top Answer: Improvements to the reporting would be good. Technical support can be improved.
Top Answer: I have been using LoadRunner Cloud for performance testing.
Top Answer: The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.
Top Answer: Overall, we're quite satisfied with the product. Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for load testing. Our focus is not so much performance testing. We focus more on load testing, which does inadvertently include performance testing, however.
Ranking
Views
7,485
Comparisons
4,965
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
555
Rating
8.2
Views
7,293
Comparisons
3,960
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
287
Rating
8.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus StormRunner Load, HPE StormRunner LoadNeoLoad
Learn
Micro Focus
Neotys
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus StormRunner Load is a simple, smart and scalable solution for Agile Cloud testing. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
N Brown Group, aHOCDell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Educational Organization50%
Financial Services Firm25%
Engineering Company13%
Retailer13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm6%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Retailer19%
Government19%
Individual & Family Service13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 7.8, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Offers good record and playback and endurance features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Akamai CloudTest, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and RadView WebLOAD. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Neotys NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.