Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Tricentis Flood

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Tricentis Flood? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.""Their technical support is awesome."

More Tricentis Flood Pros »

Cons
"Improvements to the reporting would be good.""I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons »

"The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool."

More Tricentis Flood Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools."

More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.
Top Answer: Improvements to the reporting would be good. Technical support can be improved.
Top Answer: I have been using LoadRunner Cloud for performance testing.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
7,485
Comparisons
4,965
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
555
Rating
8.2
12th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
905
Comparisons
667
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
559
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus StormRunner Load, HPE StormRunner LoadFlood IO
Learn
Micro Focus
Tricentis
Overview

Micro Focus StormRunner Load is a simple, smart and scalable solution for Agile Cloud testing. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Learn more about Tricentis Flood
Sample Customers
N Brown Group, aHOCNike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Educational Organization50%
Financial Services Firm25%
Engineering Company13%
Retailer13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm6%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Financial Services Firm4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 12th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 7.8, while Tricentis Flood is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Offers good record and playback and endurance features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Awesome technical support, integrates well, and installation is easy". Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with BlazeMeter, Neotys NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Apache JMeter. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs. Tricentis Flood report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.