Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.""The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter.""This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market.""The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily.""Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.""I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pros »

"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.""NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.""I like the scripting and parameterization features.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.""The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools.""The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved.""Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled.""The reporting has room for improvement.""It's not that popular on the cloud."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Cons »

"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.""While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

More Neotys NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money.""The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year.""They have a much more practical pricing model now."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,114
Comparisons
3,747
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
793
Rating
7.5
Views
7,043
Comparisons
3,842
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
314
Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
NeoLoad
Learn More
Neotys
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company18%
Retailer15%
Insurance Company15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company7%
REVIEWERS
Retailer19%
Government19%
Computer Software Company13%
Individual & Family Service13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise78%
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
465,058 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, LoadUI Pro and BlazeMeter, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and RadView WebLOAD. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.