Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, LoadRunner Cloud and Apache JMeter, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The information that the reports provide is very valuable, it can tell you the number of users you have, how long it is taking for specific tasks, and how much memory you have.The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter.This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center.IP Spoofing can be done using Performance Center.We can book load generators.It is mostly user-friendly and usable.It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users.

Read more »

The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.I like the scripting and parameterization features.It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing.

Read more »

Cons
It would be nice to know how much GPU memory we are using because the data points are not there or it's hard to read.The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools.While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test.Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format.It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side.

Read more »

Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.I would like to see support for auto-correlations.While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.It needs improvement with post-production.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We license it as we need it. If we use it for one client, and only need it once a year, the licensing cost for 500 users would be approximately US $2.50 per day, per user, so approximately US $1250.00 per day.It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money.

Read more »

The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.It is cheaper than other solutions.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,504
Comparisons
3,282
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
590
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
8,009
Comparisons
4,092
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
266
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance CenterNeoLoad
Learn
Micro Focus
Neotys
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlueDell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Retailer16%
Insurance Company16%
Software R&D Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company45%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Government23%
Retailer15%
Insurance Company8%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company39%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm7%
Retailer6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.