Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Perfecto

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.""The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter.""This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market.""The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily.""Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.""I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pros »

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is that it covers all types of devices on the market allowing you to test different versions of an operating system.""The most valuable feature is automated testing."

More Perfecto Pros »

Cons
"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.""The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools.""The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved.""Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled.""The reporting has room for improvement.""It's not that popular on the cloud."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Cons »

"It would be ideal if there was a complete integration with other test management tools and other applications like HPLM, Micro Focus, or Microsoft Azure.""We have had some issues with performance, which is something that should be improved."

More Perfecto Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money.""The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year.""They have a much more practical pricing model now."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

More Perfecto Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The information that the reports provide is very valuable, it can tell you the number of users you have, how long it is taking for specific tasks, and how much memory you have.
Top Answer: We have license files. The license is paid by what they call man-days, which is calculated based on the number of users that are needed and by the number of days they are going to use it for. In the… more »
Top Answer: When you are looking at what areas of the product have room for improvement, it depends on the various clients that you have and when the new operating systems come out. It can get interesting. It… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is automated testing.
Top Answer: This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%.
Top Answer: We have had challenges while using this product. The main problem has to do with OTP. OTP comes on the SIM but there is no SIM card in the cloud, so it makes it a big challenge for us. It is available… more »
Ranking
Views
5,111
Comparisons
3,743
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
793
Rating
7.5
Views
4,568
Comparisons
3,766
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
363
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance CenterPerfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web
Learn
Micro Focus
Perforce
Overview

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

Perfecto is the leading testing platform for web and mobile apps. Access the cloud for end-to-end testing from anywhere in the world. Test on real mobile devices, VMs, real Macs, and simulators and emulators. Achieve successful test automation of advanced scenarios at scale. Find bugs faster and earlier in the cycle. Robust test failure analysis and false-negative filtering allows you to identify real issues quickly. Automate testing from your CI and synch all your reporting in one place. Fix defects quickly with the industry’s most comprehensive rich test artifacts. Network virtualization and user simulation let you test like your users and reduce the chance of escaped defects. Extend test coverage and fully integrate with your entire toolchain. Perfecto makes continuous testing achievable with features including BDD & codeless automation, parallel test executions & bursting capabilities, open integrations with leading DevOps tools and automation frameworks, CI dashboards, heatmaps, rich artifacts collection, and ML-driven test analytics. See how the world’s leading digital enterprises are achieving more than 90% automation with increased test coverage and drastically-shortened test cycles. For more information about Perfecto, visit www.perfecto.io and follow us on Twitter at @PerfectoMobile

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise
Learn more about Perfecto
Sample Customers
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlueVirgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company18%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Media Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Perfecto is ranked 9th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6, while Perfecto is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perfecto writes "Good automated testing, but the price and performance could be better". Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, LoadUI Pro and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Perfecto is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Appium, HeadSpin and Experitest. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.