We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and OpenText Silk Performer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the Vuser protocols."
"It's a very powerful tool."
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."
"It is pretty easy to do test execution and results analysis. When it comes to scenario settings, LoadRunner Enterprise has an extra edge over other testing tools in the industry. The scenario setup is easy, and in terms of execution, we have a clear idea of what is happening"
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"It is mostly user-friendly and usable."
"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."
"A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"Sometimes, the code is not generated when we record the scripts in the backend."
"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."
"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."
"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."
"I think better support for cloud-based load generators would help. For example, integrate with Amazon AWS so you can quickly spin up a load generator in the cloud, use it, spin it down."
"It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side."
"The solution is expensive."
"Integration can be tricky during the setup process."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 81 reviews while OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter and OpenText ALM / Quality Center, whereas OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
