We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."
"The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter."
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product."
"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."
"The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year."
"They have a much more practical pricing model now."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"I think that the pricing is quite good."
"The pricing is expensive."
Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and BlazeMeter, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and HCL AppScan.
See our list of .
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.