• Home
  • Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] vs. PacketStorm Hurricane

Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] vs PacketStorm Hurricane comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] and PacketStorm Hurricane based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We were able to reduce a lot of hardware calls where we used to have load generators.
We are able to use real-world scenarios from the global libraries with Network Virtualization pool support. It goes through about 1.3 billion... Read more →
Use PacketStorm Hurricane?
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
9th
out of 22 in Network Modeling and Simulation
Views
187
Comparisons
110
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Shunra, HPE Network Virtualization
Hurricane
Learn More
OpenText
PacketStorm
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Network Virtualization (NV) software enables you to capture and emulate real-world network conditions, so you can use real production data into your performance testing, and along with its powerful NV Analytics, it allows you to quickly detect and resolve performance bottlenecks before deployment. Or simply said, NV empowers you to release high quality apps by accurately testing and optimizing them for all network conditions. First, NV will discover and capture live network performance conditions, such as latency, packet loss, bandwidth and jitter and then it will test the application against the captured conditions to see how various networks affect the application's performance. Then NV will analyze results and gain insight into the root cause of the performance bottlenecks to ensure that the rolled out application is optimized for target network performance.

PacketStorm Hurricane V IP network emulator provides WAN emulation and network simulation for very high data rates. The Hurricane V emulates any network condition in a repeatable and controllable lab setting. To re-create any network condition, the emulator can impair IP and non-IP traffic, provide dynamic, time varying impairments, and use a fully independent and flexible GUI architecture. Data generation provides network simulation without utilizing network resources or equipment.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Nuasis Corporation, LeftHand Networks
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization while PacketStorm Hurricane is ranked 9th in Network Modeling and Simulation. Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] is rated 7.8, while PacketStorm Hurricane is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] writes "We were able to reduce a lot of hardware calls where we used to have load generators". On the other hand, Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] is most compared with , whereas PacketStorm Hurricane is most compared with iTrinegy INE Network Emulator and IxVeriWave.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.