Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] vs Sangfor aBOS [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] and Sangfor aBOS [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Shunra, HPE Network Virtualization
aBOS
Learn More
Overview

Micro Focus Network Virtualization (NV) software enables you to capture and emulate real-world network conditions, so you can use real production data into your performance testing, and along with its powerful NV Analytics, it allows you to quickly detect and resolve performance bottlenecks before deployment. Or simply said, NV empowers you to release high quality apps by accurately testing and optimizing them for all network conditions. First, NV will discover and capture live network performance conditions, such as latency, packet loss, bandwidth and jitter and then it will test the application against the captured conditions to see how various networks affect the application's performance. Then NV will analyze results and gain insight into the root cause of the performance bottlenecks to ensure that the rolled out application is optimized for target network performance.

In reality, branch offices face IT obstacles such as lack of specialized IT personnel and physical space and power resources needed to support traditional datacenter platforms. They expect to be more productive to meet the increasing business needs; they want to be able to quickly set up a light data center and achieve rapid gateway deployment in order to fulfill requirements like securing operating systems, providing fast access and enabling remote office, etc. Sangfor aBOS (the Mini HCI) is specifically designed to cater to this demand. With virtualization technology, it only takes one server to provide Network Function Virtualization (NFV), virtual switch, virtual router and other virtual services through a unified management platform for resource allocation. Inheriting Sangfor’s strength in security and optimization, NFV allows users to deploy vIAM, vAF, vWANO, vSSL and etc. according to their needs.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Sekolah Seri Puteri (SSP), Wisma MUIS
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization while Sangfor aBOS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization. Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Sangfor aBOS [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] writes "We were able to reduce a lot of hardware calls where we used to have load generators". On the other hand, Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Sangfor aBOS [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.