Compare Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] vs. SCCM

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] is ranked unranked in Server Monitoring with 1 review while SCCM is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 12 reviews. Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] is rated 9.0, while SCCM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] writes "Provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "Enables us to set up schedules, according to security needs, to automate server and desktop patching". Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] is most compared with Huawei eSight, whereas SCCM is most compared with BigFix, Ansible and Quest KACE Systems Management.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: October 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free.Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it.Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Server Monitoring
2nd
out of 33 in Server Monitoring
Views
34,660
Comparisons
25,105
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
541
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
HPE BTO, HPE Business Technology Optimization, HPE OpenViewSystem Center Configuration Manager
Learn
Micro Focus
Video Not Available
Microsoft
Overview

The Micro Focus OpenView Performance manager, agents, and monitor combine to provide a powerful and flexible distributed management solution. This solution is a single interface for centrally monitoring, analyzing, and forecasting resource utilization for distributed multivendor environments, enabling you to offer the best possible level of service in a cost-effective manner.

With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]
Learn more about SCCM
Sample Customers
MTS IndiaBank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government8%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: October 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email