We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"Creating the script is very easy and user friendly."
"Provides the performance of load test applications and reliably on good reporting."
"We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with."
"We can book load generators."
"We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center."
"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."
"The solution supports a number of protocols."
"Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration allows for quick comparison of monitoring and performance results, a feature I highly appreciate."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"The price of this solution could be less expensive. However, this category of solutions is expensive."
"The debugging feature needs to include graphs."
"The support team needs to be more coordinated."
"The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming."
"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."
"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."
"We'd like the product to include protocol identifiers whenever a tester wants to test a new application."
"When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8, while OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca, whereas OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
