OpenText Project and portfolio Management vs Sciforma comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sciforma Logo
256 views|215 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Project and portfolio Management and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and portfolio Management vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The data provided by PPM is trusted and is available almost immediately; without trusted data there is very less scope of any tool to be successful.""Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes.""It is very important that the platform gives us a single place where we can measure progress toward goals, as we have weekly meetings with the CTO. We present these consolidated overviews and dashboards to him so that he has an overview of all the projects and can see the status of all the problems that we have and we are working on.""Overall, they have a very strong workflow management capability. That's a very strong feature because then you can model any process easily. Whether it is a demand management process, a pipeline management process, or your project delivery methodology, it is much easier because of their workflow management capability.""I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do.""Resource management: The resource management module is very complete and covers most of the time all needs of customers.""Recent Program Management lifecycle, Program Management aggregation views due to interactive UI (selection of risks, issues, and changes in Program Overview) and “flash look & feel" of this functional chunk, which is different in comparison to other parts of HPE PPM.""Scenario comparison is the feature most valuable to us and the reason why we decided to choose HPE PPM over other portfolio management products."

More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Pros →

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.""It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team.""I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

More Sciforma Pros →

Cons
"Currently, HPE PPM does not allow “Project” approval, but only simple “Demand Request” approval (mobility).""Reporting; need to be able to provide fancy reporting out of PPM, way it is done in OBIEE etc.""Portfolio scenarios: This is a very powerful feature. However, it’s limited to analyses.""They can make its UI better. Currently, the UI is a bit clunky.""The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good.""Sometimes features in PPM don't work as expected, or our users request a new feature. Typically, our partner vendor can deploy those changes. But there have been a few instances when we had to raise it with Micro Focus because it's beyond the ability of our partner vendor. When we raise the issue with Micro Focus, it sometimes takes time because it needs support from other customers using PPM, not just our bank. It goes through a voting system. Other customers need to vote for the feature. The features that get the most votes will possibly be added.""I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView.""The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."

More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Cons →

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources.""The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.""The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

More Sciforma Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."
  • "It is SaaS without a base fee."
  • "HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"
  • "Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."
  • "We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."
  • "A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."
  • More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."
  • "The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • More Sciforma Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message.  You can… more »
    Top Answer:Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows.
    Top Answer:A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users.
    Top Answer:The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    681
    Comparisons
    307
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    1,245
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    256
    Comparisons
    215
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    552
    Rating
    9.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management, HPE PPM
    One2team
    Learn More
    Overview
    OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) combines workflows and data to align investments with strategy. Top-down and bottom-up analytics power this strategic portfolio and project management tool.
    Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.
    Sample Customers
    Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG
    1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Insurance Company14%
    Non Profit14%
    Maritime Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    OpenText Project and portfolio Management vs. Sciforma
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and portfolio Management vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Project and portfolio Management is ranked 10th in Project Portfolio Management with 24 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews. OpenText Project and portfolio Management is rated 7.8, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Project and portfolio Management writes "Gives management a cohesive place for tracking business strategies and goals, but cosmetic aspects need work". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". OpenText Project and portfolio Management is most compared with Jira, Planview PPM Pro, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Smartsheet and Teamwork , whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our OpenText Project and portfolio Management vs. Sciforma report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.