Compare Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,155
Comparisons
611
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
937
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
1,084
Comparisons
961
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HPE Project and Portfolio Management, HPE PPMPrimavera Portfolio Management, OPPM, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Learn
Micro Focus
Oracle
Overview
HPE Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) provides critical information in real time to help you make the right investment decisions. It standardizes, manages, and captures the execution of project and operational activities as well as resources.Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)
Learn more about Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Sample Customers
Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AGYarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Insurance Company25%
Maritime Company13%
Marketing Services Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company61%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm4%
Marketing Services Firm4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 12th in Project Portfolio Management. Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is rated 10.0, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) writes "Provides a good balance of flexibility and functionality; very powerful". On the other hand, Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is most compared with Broadcom Clarity PPM, ITM Platform, Jira, JIRA Portfolio and Microsoft Project Server, whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Microsoft Project Server and Artemis Enterprise.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.