We performed a comparison between OpenText ALM / Quality Center and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is stable and reliable."
"The product can scale."
"The most valuable user feature that we use right now is the camera."
"It has a brand new look and feel. It comes with a new dashboard that looks nice, and you can see exactly what you have been working with."
"Most of the features that I like the best are more on the analytics side."
"What they do best is test management. That's their strong point."
"Quality management, project management from a QA perspective - testing, defect management, how testing relates back to requirements."
"You can do your development from start to finish: starting with the requirements, ending with defects, and testing in-between."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."
"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."
"This is a user friendly solution."
"Client-side ActiveX with patch upgrades"
"I'm looking at more towards something more from a DevOps perspective. For example, how to pull the DevOps ecosystem into the Micro Focus ALM."
"The support is not good and the documentation is not consistent."
"ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach."
"I'd like to see the concept of teams put into it."
"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve how the automation process works. Addiotnlally, the parallel execution needs to be optimized. For example, if multiple users, which are two or more users, are doing an execution, while we execute the cases, I have seen some issues in the progress."
"If they could improve their BPT business components that would be good"
"We operate in Sweden, and there are not so many Swedish people that know the product."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."
"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 197 reviews while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 8.0, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, OpenText ALM Octane, Jira, Tricentis qTest and IBM Rational Quality Manager, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Sealights and QMetry Test Management. See our OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. TestRail report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.