Compare Micro Focus Real User Monitor vs. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront

Micro Focus Real User Monitor is ranked 29th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review while VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is ranked 10th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 6 reviews. Micro Focus Real User Monitor is rated 5.0, while VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Real User Monitor writes "Works well as part of an end-to-end solution, but product roadmap has halted". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront writes "Simplifies troubleshooting by identifying trends from different data sources". Micro Focus Real User Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog and AppDynamics, whereas VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace and AppDynamics.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Real User Monitor? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools.

Read more »

No issues with stability.The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.People are very pleased with the implementation.The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.

Read more »

Cons
One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap.

Read more »

It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality.They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.The implementation is a long process that should be improved.In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD.Educational pricing is available for this solution.We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
654
Comparisons
515
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
712
Avg. Rating
5.0
Views
5,040
Comparisons
3,967
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
534
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUMWavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability
Learn
Micro Focus
VMware
Overview

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Real User Monitor
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Sample Customers
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEBBox, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, Lyft
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Retailer10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.