• Home
  • Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL] vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL] vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL] and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL]?
Milind Parab
Useful for automated SQA, certifications, but the summary reports could improve
The tool is part of Automated Code Flow. It helps in SQA and Automotive Certification.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."

    • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Security Testing (AST)
    28th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    1,135
    Comparisons
    777
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SecurityScope, Fortify Program Trace Analyzer, HPE SecurityScope
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    OpenText
    Video Not Available
    Parasoft
    Overview

    Micro Focus WebInspect is a Web application security assessment solution designed to thoroughly analyze today’s complex Web applications and Web services for security vulnerabilities. It delivers broad technology coverage, fast scanning capabilities, extensive vulnerability knowledge, and accurate Web application scanning results. Micro Focus WebInspect is an integral part of the Micro Focus integrated security testing technologies that uncover real and relevant security vulnerabilities in a way that siloed security testing cannot.

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    Sample Customers
    Neosecure, Rabobank, NAMIC Insurance Company, UBM Tech, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Bank of Tianjin
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST) while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 28th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 30 reviews. Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". Micro Focus SecurityScope [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork and Polyspace Code Prover.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.