Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and OpenText Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
SrinivasPakala
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
  • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    25th
    Views
    1,767
    Comparisons
    1,205
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Service Test, HPE Service Test
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Overview

    Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
    Sample Customers
    John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Apache JMeter, OpenText UFT Developer and SmartBear TestComplete.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.