• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and OpenText UFT Digital Lab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Jacques Vermeulen
Robust solution for application lifecycle management with numerous valuable features
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."
  • "The product could be more affordable."
  • "While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

    • More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
    Top Answer:There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
    Top Answer:I believe there's always room for improvement in various aspects. For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
    Top Answer:There are various use cases, each tailored to the specific needs of our customers. When we consider Application Lifecycle Management (ALM), the use case significantly differs from Unified Functional… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    20th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    778
    Comparisons
    531
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Service Test, HPE Service Test
    Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
    Learn More
    OpenText
    OpenText
    Overview

    Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

    Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.
    Sample Customers
    John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
    Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText UFT Digital Lab is ranked 20th in Functional Testing Tools with 16 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText UFT Digital Lab is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT Digital Lab writes "Robust solution for application lifecycle management with numerous valuable features". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText UFT Digital Lab is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Appium, Perfecto, AWS Device Farm and Sauce Labs.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.