We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and OpenText UFT Developer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText UFT Developer is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 34 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText UFT Developer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT Developer writes "Integrates well, has LeanFT library, and good object detection ". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText UFT Developer is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Silk Test, froglogic Squish and Original Software TestDrive.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.