Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite
Sponsored
 | Judy Zeman QA Manager at Carrier Global Corp. |
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
Use Oracle Application Testing Suite? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done."
"The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP."
"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."
"Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."
Information Not Available
"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice »
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to automate quickly and to maintain and update scripts.
Top Answer: I haven't a bad opinion about the prices, however, when you pay a license is for a month or a year but in my experience… more »
Top Answer: We would like this to be able to be used outside of SAP applications, as it would be good for other types of products.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Service Test, HPE Service Test
OATS
Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.
Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
Manufacturing Company28%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Logistics Company8%
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Government6%
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 40th in Functional Testing Tools while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0.0, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Doesn't require a separate management tool but it is lacking support ". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Apache JMeter and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.