Micro Focus Service Test vs. Original Software TestDrive

As of February 2019, Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools vs Original Software TestDrive which is ranked 12th in Regression Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with UFT (QTP). Original Software TestDrive is most compared with Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
31st
Views
731
Comparisons
184
Reviews
0
Followers
204
Avg. Rating
N/A
12th
Views
94
Comparisons
40
Reviews
0
Followers
31
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2019.
316,786 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service TestTestDrive-UAT
Learn
Micro Focus
Original Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

TestDrive is our Automated Software Quality (ASQ) solution that addresses the need to achieve rapid automation. It is designed to test browser, client/server and legacy applications. It’s device emulation support even enables you to test responsive web applications designed for mobile devices.

The result is higher quality applications, delivered to market in a shorter period of time. In essence, the whole application development process becomes more productive

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about Original Software TestDrive
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankEnzen
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2019.
316,786 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email