Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn More
Overview

Micro FocusĀ Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro FocusĀ LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing unties the Goardian knot between successful test cases and manual business knowledge capture, emancipating regression testing of its human factor. Autonomous Testing spans test conception through validation, addressing all aspects of the functional testing lifecycle, including discovery, execution, acceleration and test management. It helps organization reduce time, effort and risk as well as the complexity associated with business process understanding. Powered by innovative machine learning, Autonomous Testing eliminates the pains associated with creating and maintaining manually engineered scripts to enable zero touch test case creation and maintenance. The solution ensures quality teams test the right things by automatically capturing transactions production and converting them into test cases that represent domain expertise. Autonomous Testing eliminates the challenge of business knowledge transfer, ensuring testing mirrors actual user behavior.
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Aritzia, Allianz, Coca-Cola, Clarks, Shiseido
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Panaya Autonomous SAP Testing [EOL] is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Wikidi Testomato.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.