• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Parasoft Logo

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
815 views|564 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Milind Parab
Useful for automated SQA, certifications, but the summary reports could improve
The tool is part of Automated Code Flow. It helps in SQA and Automotive Certification.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."

    • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    23rd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    815
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Service Test, HPE Service Test
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    OpenText
    Parasoft
    Overview

    Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    Sample Customers
    John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and Klocwork.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.