We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Ranorex Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Ranorex Studio is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Ranorex Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ranorex Studio writes "Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Ranorex Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.