Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. Selenium HQ

Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Gives a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Functional, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus Service Test Logo
125 views|90 comparisons
Selenium HQ Logo
15,706 views|12,853 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.

More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
37th
Views
125
Comparisons
90
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
5th
Views
15,706
Comparisons
12,853
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
444
Avg. Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service TestSeleniumHQ
Learn
Micro Focus
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankBrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Retailer19%
Comms Service Provider10%
Manufacturing Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.