Micro Focus Service Test vs TestingWhiz

Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 35th in Functional Testing Tools vs TestingWhiz which is ranked 42nd in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with SoapUI Pro, LoadRunner and Silk Test. TestingWhiz is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete and Ranorex.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Ranking
RANKING
Views
694
Comparisons
302
Reviews
0
Followers
380
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
359
Comparisons
275
Reviews
0
Followers
72
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Micro Focus Service Test competitors »
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
See more TestingWhiz competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsService Test, HPE Service Test
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
Cygnet Infotech
Overview
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

OFFER
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about TestingWhiz
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersJohn Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankVerizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email