Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs TestingWhiz comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and TestingWhiz based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
38th
Views
125
Comparisons
101
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn More
Overview

Micro FocusĀ Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro FocusĀ LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while TestingWhiz is ranked 38th in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while TestingWhiz is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas TestingWhiz is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.