Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. ZAPTEST

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus Service Test Logo
117 views|83 comparisons
ZAPTEST Logo
2,718 views|1,272 comparisons
Ranking
37th
Views
117
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
30th
Views
2,718
Comparisons
1,272
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn
Micro Focus
ZAPTEST
Overview

Micro FocusĀ Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro FocusĀ LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about ZAPTEST
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankAT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider16%
Construction Company12%
Media Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while ZAPTEST is ranked 30th in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0.0, while ZAPTEST is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish and Micro Focus UFT One.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.