We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Automation Anywhere (AA) and ReadyAPI.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.