We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and TestRail, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.