Micro Focus Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Micro Focus Silk Test is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs SmartBear TestComplete which is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 17 reviews. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". Micro Focus Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT (QTP), SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus Quality Center. SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Micro Focus UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Tricentis Tosca. See our Micro Focus Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Micro focus silk test vs. smartbear testcomplete report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Silk Test vs. SmartBear TestComplete and others in Functional Testing Tools
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Micro Focus Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Micro focus silk test vs. smartbear testcomplete report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Silk Test vs. SmartBear TestComplete and others in Functional Testing Tools
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
7,174
Comparisons
3,836
Reviews
4
Followers
863
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
29,373
Comparisons
13,766
Reviews
18
Followers
2,268
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Micro Focus Silk Test competitors »
Oaqp0rmd 400x400
Compared 7% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1516468546
SmartBear Software
  • Vendor 7999 screenshot 1514061614
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
35%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Transportation Company
9%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
25%
Large Enterprise
58%
Micro focus silk test vs. smartbear testcomplete report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Silk Test vs. SmartBear TestComplete and others in Functional Testing Tools
Download now
252,993 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email