• Home
  • OpenText Silk Test vs. ZAPTEST

OpenText Silk Test vs ZAPTEST comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

OpenText Silk Test

Read 16 OpenText Silk Test reviews
1,719 views|1,168 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST Logo

ZAPTEST

Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
526 views|274 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Test and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
SrinivasPakala
Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available
Anonymous User
The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation.
I was able to automate an application, where object identifications have impeded any progress in automating the regression bed. With ZAPTEST, we... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

    • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    1,719
    Comparisons
    1,168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    31st
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    526
    Comparisons
    274
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    OpenText
    ZAPTEST
    Overview
    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
    ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
    Sample Customers
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
    AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Automation Anywhere (AA) and ReadyAPI.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.