Fortify Software Security Center vs NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Mahammad Azeem
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
  • "The solution is priced fair."
  • More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    376
    Comparisons
    303
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Security Testing (AST)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
    NTOSpider
    Learn More
    Overview
    Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
    While today's malicious attackers pursue a variety of goals, they share a preferred channel of attack - the millions of custom web, mobile, and cloud applications companies deploy to serve their customers. NTOSpider dynamically scans these applications for vulnerabilities across all modern technologies, provides tools that speed remediation and monitors applications for changes.
    Sample Customers
    Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
    University of Salzburg, Chr. Hansen, American Chemical Society, North American Retail Chain, Wiltshire Council, Redner's Markets, Acosta Sales & Marketing
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews while NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST). Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4, while NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] writes "There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product". Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Fortify on Demand, Tricentis Tosca and Fortify WebInspect, whereas NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.