Fortify Software Security Center vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
376 views|303 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Spirent Logo
628 views|398 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Software Security Center and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Mahammad Azeem
Haider Jarral
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have.""This is a stable solution at the end of the day.""You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

More Fortify Software Security Center Pros →

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""CyberFlood is flexible.""The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful.""This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users.""We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

More Fortify Software Security Center Cons →

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.""I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.""The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
  • "The solution is priced fair."
  • More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    376
    Comparisons
    303
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    628
    Comparisons
    398
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview
    Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 26th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 4 reviews. Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Fortify on Demand, Tricentis Tosca and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.