Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] vs Quest NetVault comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] and Quest NetVault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, IBM, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of the Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager is good."

More Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] Pros →

"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails.""The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration.""Having the web-based interface is important to us because we can access it from any computer in the network, rather than having it installed and available for use only on a specific one.""Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great.""The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want.""The user interface is good.""It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us.""The interface is very user-friendly."

More Quest NetVault Pros →

Cons
"Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager could improve by having more parameters for storage. When you take the solution out of the box there need to be some more features built-in."

More Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] Cons →

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management.""The storage capacity is very low.""The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement.""There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency.""There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily.""The initial setup is a little complex.""The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find.""The stability of the solution is poor."

More Quest NetVault Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."
  • "When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."
  • "The tool is expensive."
  • More Quest NetVault Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution It is easy to use right out of the box and scales… more »
    Top Answer:If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails.
    Top Answer:The storage capacity is very low. The solution removes all the data in 15 days. We need the history for at least one or two months. I need the history whenever I run Tape. I need the details of the… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Storage Management
    44th
    out of 131 in Backup and Recovery
    Views
    1,925
    Comparisons
    1,206
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE Storage Essentials, HPE Storage Operations Manager
    NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone
    Learn More
    Overview

    With Micro Focus Storage Essentials, you can manage complexity and growth, improve storage utilization and reduce cost, and align storage service to business needs.

    Cloud-ready data recovery software for the hybrid data center. Protect your applications and data on-premises and in the cloud — from one intuitive console — with this scalable data backup and recovery software. NetVault® by Quest supports multiple server and application platforms in both physical and virtual environments. That means you can ensure continuous availability of your business-critical systems, applications and data.

    Sample Customers
    Etty Hillesum Lyceum, University of Cincinnati, Lancaster Central School District
    intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Storage Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, IBM, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management while Quest NetVault is ranked 44th in Backup and Recovery with 10 reviews. Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Quest NetVault is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] writes "Helpful support, useful AI, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest NetVault writes "Easy to use, stable, affordable pricing model, and good technical support". Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Quest NetVault is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Quest Rapid Recovery, Veritas NetBackup, Commvault Cloud and Azure Backup.

    We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.