• Home
  • OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. SmarteSoft Testing Suite

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs SmarteSoft Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Performance Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and SmarteSoft Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Performance Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
reviewer9020156
Has good scalability, is intuitive, and is easy to use and navigate
The solution has improved the performance of the software.
Use SmarteSoft Testing Suite?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."
  • "There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."
  • "We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."
  • "Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "It is expensive compared to other tools."
  • "LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."
  • "The solution’s price is considerably high."

    • More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
    Top Answer:I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to… more »
    What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
    Top Answer:One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.
    Read all 18 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadR...
    Top Answer:The solution is a bit expensive. The pay-as-you-go model offered by LoadRunner Cloud is important to us, especially when considering the cost-effectiveness of performance testing.
    Read all 12 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 29 in Performance Testing Tools
    Views
    4,684
    Comparisons
    2,811
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    602
    Rating
    8.6
    25th
    out of 29 in Performance Testing Tools
    Views
    39
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
    Learn More
    OpenText
    SmarteSoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.
    SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.
    Sample Customers
    Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
    Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Educational Organization22%
    Retailer11%
    Government11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Performance Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 39 reviews while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is ranked 25th in Performance Testing Tools. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is rated 8.2, while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud writes "Enterprise modeling, server maintenance, and competitive pricing". On the other hand, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Apache JMeter, whereas SmarteSoft Testing Suite is most compared with .

    See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.